All civilizations move in cycles. Sometimes these cycles are the swing of the
pendulum to the extremes of its arc and then back again. What rises, falls; what falls, rises. We might like to think of our national story
as a straight-line march to and through the “American Century.” But it has actually been a sequence of major
chapters within the Great American Novel through which our erratic story has
been told.
It took 168 years to bring America out of its infancy, its
Colonial settlement period, from Jamestown in 1607 until the battles of
Lexington and Concord in 1775. Quite the
long infancy period to get ready for this national adventure. But when the time came, our forefathers and
foremothers were ready. They moved
forward, working (unknowingly) in roughly 50-year major increments.
1776-1826 was our Founding Period, organizing this
new American Experiment in popular governance.
It took a Revolution, a Constitution, imagination and deep commitment to
move this vague concept into a working reality.
All of the principal characters of this first period were a product of
the Revolution and Constitutional Convention, including our first six
presidents. Thomas Jefferson and John Adams
both died on July 4, 1826, and John Quincy Adams’ presidency ended in 1828,
both events emphatically concluding this period. But the Experiment in Governance, and the
Founders’ goal of national unity transcending the states, had held.
1826-1876 took us into an Expansion and Division
Period. Presidential leadership moved
from the patrician Founders to the era of the Common Man. Andrew Jackson redefined the presidency into
a power equal to or greater than Congress, and fought against the wealthy’s
backroom hold on national power. The
country moved west and began to fill in the open space that would become the
continental United States of America.
Yet this expansion was continually undermined by threats to divide this
hard-won unity over the still unresolved Constitutional Convention issues of
slavery and states’ rights. The threats
of division came true in the American Civil War (1861-1865), and the subsequent
Reconstruction Era over the defeated South.
Reconstruction, and this historical Period, “ended” as a result of the
deal-making of the 1876 presidential election.
As it turned out, ending Reconstruction reinstituted the pre-war South, who
now fought a rear-guard resistance of continued division lasting through to this
day, with laws replacing bullets and legislatures replacing battlefields.
1877 – 1929 was our Capitalist and Labor Period. An economic division of America. If you were part of the mega-rich Capitalist
sector – the Rockefellers, Vanderbilts, Fords, etc. – it was the “Gilded Age”
of absolute monopolies, boardroom collusion, and rigging the marketplace to
obtain spectacular wealth. If you were in
the worker sector, it was about poverty, oppressive work, employment conditions
without recourse or protection – ultimately giving rise to the organized labor
movement. Money dominated this period,
and money equated to power. Theodore
Roosevelt’s attacks on “financial trusts” served as a speed bump along the road
to wealth, but it only slowed, not stopped, the Pullman luxury trains. Even World War I, which changed the map of
Europe and the Middle East, was only a short diversion for America. The “Roaring Twenties” brought all of America
into the frenzied chase for wealth.
1930-1976 began our Middle-Class and Government Expansion
Period, when the economic frenzy of the previous Period abruptly ended in 1929 with
America’s Great Depression. The family
fortunes from the Gilded Age remained fairly intact through the
Depression. It was the common Joe and
Josephine who lost everything, the ones who were the last to arrive at the
get-rich party before the bubble burst.
Big-money’s power over the government was checked – though not
eliminated – as the federal government’s attention, programs and funding were redirected
to the needs and suffering of Middle Americans trying to survive the Depression. Millions of middle-class Americans fought and
won WWII at home and abroad. Upon the
war’s end, new opportunities from government programs created the largest
middle-class, consumer-based, sustained economy in our history, redefining
government and the face of American society. It was a redefinition that came to
include a redressing of civil and economic rights across a spectrum of
previously hidden constituencies: e.g. African-Americans, women, the
gay/lesbian movement, Native-Americans, the poor. Lyndon Johnson’s attempt to create a “Great
Society” blew up in the 1960s/1970s wake of Viet Nam, the youth movement, and
ultimately, Watergate. Gerald Ford
promised us that “our long national nightmare [of Watergate] is over.” But so also
was America’s Middle-Class and Government Expansion Period.
1976 began our current 50 year cycle of a
simultaneous Retrenchment and Advancement Period. Similar to the previous
Expansion and Division Period, it is a time when a deep and contradictory
schism has split the citizenry. It has
been a return to times past governmentally and economically, yet concurrently a
leap forward in the social order and measures of equality. Since the Reagan years, we have been on a
steady return to the Gilded Age of 100 years ago. Extreme wealth has returned into the hands of
the few, leaving the great Middle Class stagnant economically – if not going
backwards from its post-WWII gains. We
neutered the financial controls instituted in the 1930s, and in 2008 unsurprisingly
had our worst Recession since that Depression.
(Apparently learning nothing, we are now dismantling the new controls
that arose out of that Recession.) Since the mid-1990s, division has been our
overriding theme of (non-) governance. The disappearance of bipartisanship has
resulted in a virtual end of functioning government and a handover of power to
wealthy businesspeople. “Conservative” politicians ascended and pushed for
shrinking government’s size while practicing “fiscal responsibility,” but these
have proven to be more idealized myths than actuality. Meanwhile, “Liberal”
social themes from the prior cycle – civil rights, protected environment,
racial integration, economic parity, and gay and gender issues – continued to
expand. However, a backlash from social conservatives to this expansion has grown
steadily out of a belief that their traditional family lifestyles, and their
role in America, is under attack and being lost. The citizenry today is as
polarized and paralyzed by two competing views of what America means as much as
any time since our Civil War.
If our pattern of 50-year cycles holds true, then our next
cycle is due roughly in 2026, 250 years after our founding. What will this next cycle bring to us? Like all others, it will unfold gradually,
requiring time for us to identify the themes that are emerging. Will the next phase cement the Retrenchment we
currently find ourselves in? Or will it push
the Advancement forward and begin a new period of social, economic and
political movement? Will America achieve
greater heights over the next decade, or start our gradual descent as a leader
in world civilization – a descent that happens to all civilizations at some
point?
When changes have occurred within our historical cycle, they
have usually been forecasted by a rising tension between “the old that is” and
“the new that is to be.” The end of the Founding Period saw a disputed 1824
presidential election and the political shock waves of Jackson’s presidency.
The end of the Expansion and Division Period came with our American Civil War –
our most deadly war – and the utter destruction of the Old South society. The
end of the Capitalist and Labor Period was America’s twelve year Depression
with its 25% unemployment. The end of the Middle Class Period was Viet Nam,
Watergate, and the youth revolution which tore apart America’s cohesion and
trust. In each instance, a drastic upheaval was needed to move our “current”
into “past” in order to open the door to our “future.”
Today, we see governmental paralysis, the Trump dismantling
of the institutional Presidency, the reversal of government’s role in America,
and the abdication of international moral and political leadership. The result
is a country in an angry divide not seen since the turmoil of 1968 and the
immediate years beyond; the parallels between 1968 and 2018 – another 50 year
cycle – are unmistakable. According to the Pew Research Center, in 1964 77% of
Americans trusted their government all or most of the time. In December 2017,
that number had fallen to just 18% (TIME, 6/11/2018). Donald Trump’s presidency
is clearly the beginning of our next transition. What is unclear is whether his
time will be the blueprint, the model for America’s next Period. Or, whether his
excesses ultimately cross a fault line and become the final hurrah of
Retrenchment, thereby giving rise to a new period of government and societal Advancement.
I hope to live to see the beginnings of this next American
cycle, at least sufficiently to see the direction it will be heading. It would be nice to have some sense of what
kind of country my generation is bequeathing to our children and grandchildren.
I certainly will not be around to see the end of this next cycle. Perhaps the upcoming 2018 and 2020 elections
will give us some preview of what to expect; the 2024 election will most
certainly commence the opening step. We
should look forward to this next cycle with great interest and anticipation,
but also caution. It will be the next
crossroad in America’s journey.
© 2018 Randy Bell www.ThoughtsFromTheMountain.blogspot.com
8 comments:
Thank you, Randy. Your knowledge and values are so helpful to me. Bless you.
Dam, but you’re a gifted and incisive thinker/writer!
This is a really excellent historical summary... my only question is: while I realize that 50 years is a convenient category, do you think the increasing pace of technology evolution will force history to expand faster and in smaller increments? And here I thought there was only NOW!
To your question … On a purely intuitive basis, no, I do not think technology will condense this cycle. Technology (in various forms) has been advancing throughout our whole 243 years, yet the 50-year pattern still holds. Within the cycle "the toys" we use change - dramatically so during this current cycle -- but we are talking about people's thinking. I have not seen any change in that. It still takes an adult lifetime (50 years) .for change to surface, be assimilated, and made semi-permanent. Just my thought. Randy.
Randy, so well written, concise and of real value to me. I plan to pass it along to friends.
Your friend,
Janet
An excellent essay condensing 250 years of American history into a concise explanation of the major themes. One of your best efforts, my friend. Thank you.
I think there's some merit to the idea about the effect of technology on the pace of change. Technology is advancing at a faster speed than ever before and may well shorten that 50 year cycle you write about. It will be interesting to see what happens and I, like you, hope I'm alive to see the beginnings of what comes next.
): How wonderful to have this perspective. I have felt so much despair since Trump's election and haven't had a way to sort it out. In reaction to the incongruence it breeds in my belly, I have been on a news diet. I listen to NPR and read the occasional commentary, but that's about it, and I still feel overwhelmed. Randy's piece is a helpful perspective. As a lover of history, it was truly wonderful to see our country in a longer story arc and helpful to see that even though we don't know the future that the shift ahead will take us somewhere new and that is part of the story of our country. My gratitude to Randy for being a wise presence..... much needed in these heartbreaking and bewildering times!
Really well done, Randy.
Post a Comment