The 1920’s. A time variously nicknamed “The Roaring
Twenties” and “The Jazz Age.” Coming after the end of WW I – “The Great War to
end all wars” – it was a time characterized by excess. The destructiveness of
the War shocked many of the American doughboys who went to Europe to fight in
the stalemate trenches. It was a Valley of Death that broke the “can do” spirit
of many, and/or infused a “live for today” attitude in others. The experience
made for a time ripe for unbridled responses to take hold in America, not all of
them good ones.
During the Roaring Twenties, the corporate barons that
emerged in the 1880s were still running the economy, if not government itself. Getting
rich was the order of the day, pursued with gusto by financial barons,
corporate giants, and, increasingly, everyday Joes alike. But it was not just
economic excess. Women had finally won the right to vote, which stoked not only
a new sense of legal freedoms but also social ones – it was the age of the
independently-spirited “flapper girl.” Prohibition ended the people’s access to
alcoholic drink – except that it didn’t. Booze flowed freely in speakeasies and
private homes, supplied by organized crime and moonshiners. It was one big
party time, danced appropriately to the frenzied moves of the Charleston.
But there was also a darker underside to this national
party. The American borders had become porous with immigrants coming in. During
1900-1920, it was Southern and Eastern Europeans knocking on America’s door, most
all passing through the processing station at Ellis Island. Many Americans felt
vulnerable to all these “non-English” people who seemed to threaten the
cultural and economic landscape – if not the very security – of the country. Calls
for tighter immigration limits grew ever louder as many felt that their
government was not doing enough to stem this flow. Growing numbers of people
looked for an alternative force to speak for them and push back – forcibly if
necessary – on these open doors. They found that alternative in the Ku Klux
Klan (KKK).
The Klan had originally risen from the collapse of the South
after the Civil War. In the 1870s and 1880s, it had terrorized the newly freed
ex-slaves. It promoted the role of White Southerners by reinstalling de facto
slavery through economic servitude, “legal” disenfranchisement, and systematic
killings with impunity. By the end of the 19th century, the Klan’s
influence had faded. But the replacement cultural and legal structures it had
created endured, set firmly and inalterably in place. Its resurrection always stood
ready to be recalled to active duty.
The 1920s was a time of fear of the immigrant, fear of the
loss of one’s cultural identity, fear of an impotent government sworn to
protect its citizens and keep them safe, and fear of attack on “America’s
religion” (i.e. Christian Protestantism) by competing religions, scientific reasoning
and discovery, and the forsaking of traditional infallible religious teachings.
In such times, a substantial number of Americans turned to a reborn Ku Klux
Klan. This time the Klan was not just contained within the South; it became a
national organization. Guided by the tactics, hate literature and “social
theories” of its predecessor, this new Klan offered itself as the balance
against “these undesirables” who they characterized as dangerous enemies, criminals,
lesser human beings, immoral people intent on subverting True Americans. To
expand their message and recruitment, they combined this new hate with the
Klan’s historical prejudices against African-Americans, Catholics and Jews. Great
numbers of followers across the country, estimated at over four million, were
drawn into this new KKK, including Congressional politicians seeking money and (re-)election.
The strength of the Klan was graphically exemplified in August 1925 when a march
on Washington down Pennsylvania Avenue attracted more than 35,000 thousands of
white-robed but bare-faced Klansmen.
Yet many people chose to fight back by speaking up against
this national travesty: principled politicians, journalists and writers,
members of the judiciary, religious leaders. Congress investigated the Klan in
1921, producing no great conclusions or restraints; the ensuing publicity both
advanced and hindered the Klan’s popularity. In these times, when American
values, principles, and the traditions of our Founding documents seemed in
danger of being lost, someone was clearly needed to remind us of who America –
and Americans – truly are.
Republican Calvin Coolidge was born in the simple rural
countryside of Vermont. He made a political name for himself as mayor in
Northampton in western Massachusetts, subsequently as governor of
Massachusetts. Vice President Coolidge became our 30th President upon the sudden
death of Warren Harding. The thoughtful but taciturn Coolidge – nicknamed
“Silent Cal” – was decidedly pro-business, most famously remembered as saying
“the business of America is business.” He is less frequently quoted for his follow-on
qualifying words: “The chief ideal of the American people is idealism. I cannot
repeat too often that America is a nation of idealists. That is the only motive
to which they ever give any strong and lasting reaction.”
As America’s national hate and fear of “others” grew during
the 1920s, it was the quiet Coolidge who used his infrequent public words to
remind the country of a most important lesson. As historian Jon Meacham relates
in his excellent book “The Soul of America,” a man had written to Coolidge
that, “It is of some concern whether a Negro is allowed to run for Congress
anywhere, at any time, in any party, in this, a white man’s country.” Recalling
that half a million black men had served in the recent War, Coolidge spoke in
response:
“The suggestion of denying any measure of their full
political rights to such a group of our population as the colored people is one
which, however it might be received in some other quarters, could not possibly
be permitted by one who feels a responsibility for living up to the traditions
and maintaining the principles of the Republican Party. Our Constitution
guarantees equal rights to all of our citizens, without discrimination on
account of race or color. I have taken my oath to support the Constitution. It
is the source of your rights and my rights. I propose to regard it, and
administer it, as the source of the rights of all the people, whatever their
belief or race.”
Subsequently, Coolidge told an American Legion convention in
1925:
“If we are to have … that union of spirit which is the
foundation of real national genius and national progress, we must all realize
that there are true Americans who did not happen to be born in our section of
the country, who do not attend our place of religious worship, who are not of
our racial stock, or who are not proficient in our language. If we are to
create on this continent a free Republic and an enlightened civilization that
will be capable of reflecting the true greatness and glory of mankind, it will
be necessary to regard these differences as accidental and unessential. We
shall have to look beyond the outward manifestations of race and creed. Divine
Providence has not bestowed upon any race a monopoly of patriotism and
character.”
Sometimes in the midst of hatred, prejudice or fear, it
takes great courage to speak clearly against the popular tide. Calvin Coolidge
was a President who knew the value of not speaking often, but making one’s
words count for something worthwhile. It is leading not by the quantity of
words issued daily, but by their quality and substance. These messages from
almost 100 years ago, in times similar to our own, warrant being repeated
today.
© 2018
Randy Bell www.ThoughtsFromTheMountain.blogspot.com
3 comments:
Thanks, Randy. A good read contrasting the leadership of today with true leadership with wisdom from yesterday.
WELL researched and expertly written, as usual. On a lighter note, a reporter once approached Silent Cal at a dinner and told him he had a bet with another reporter that he couldn’t get Coolidge to say more than two words. “You lose” came the reply.
I have had the good fortune of knowing Randy Bell for just shy of 3 years. He is a thoughtful, researched, meticulous, balanced writer on topics of the day. In the short time of our acquaintanceship, I've read more than 3 years' worth of his writings. And I'm the better for it.
Post a Comment