Election 2012 - The Campaign - Remembered
These days, there is not much of anything in which you
can find agreement among more than 50% of Americans, with perhaps two
exceptions: 1) disgust at what has
become the partisan paralytic ineffectiveness of our national government; 2) a
deep longing for this 2012 political campaign to end soon.
This billion-dollar campaign for the presidency has been
two years in the making. Dozens of
debates; poll-after-poll providing no definitive information. Each day brings yet another slick flyer that
says nothing of substance yet serves up much misinformation; most often they make
me more convinced than ever to vote against the sender due to the alien
positions they espouse. Requests for
political donations show up continually in my mailbox, my email account, on web
pages I am reading. Our fears of
corporate and individual big-money players attempting to buy the election are
proving distressingly true – especially if you have the misfortune to live in
one of the “battleground states.”
Most importantly, our collective knowledge of what is
truly happening in this country, and what the real causes of our problems are, remain
woefully uninformed in spite of all this time and money spent. There has been no meaningful discussion about
the real opportunities and solutions we need to govern from the middle ground –
the place where most Americans live and think.
Any fool can cut spending by “slashing and burning,” but only an
experienced and wise leader/CEO knows how to cut strategically while preserving
the core mission of the organization. Bumper
sticker slogans are not solutions.
Some of the blame for this state of affairs must go to
candidates who avoid integrity and honesty in favor of rhetorical opportunism. Some blame must go to political parties for whom
winning elections and holding power trumps serving the needs of the
people. And some blame must go to the
American people. We get what we accept,
and we have failed to call to account the irresponsibility of all candidates
and parties when they are deceitful. If
all we do is “blame the other guy” instead of calling out our own
candidate/party when needed, then we cannot complain about a broken governance
system built upon partisan pandering.
Sometimes, the perspectives of our ancestors can be
helpful in getting us through tough times such as these. In 1936, President Franklin Roosevelt ran for
a second term against Republican Alf Landon of Kansas after four years of
responding to America’s worst economic collapse. Foreign wars were breaking out across the
globe, threatening to draw America into violence it did not seek. Millions were out of work (@25%
unemployment); many people were losing their homes, farms and businesses; our
agricultural breadbasket in middle America was devastated by extreme weather
conditions. All remarkably similar but
worse than our country is today. In a
kickoff speech to the New York Democratic State Convention, Roosevelt offered several
political observations.
First he talked about Wall Street and the bankers who
brought about the Depression: “A few
people … seem to have forgotten those [early] days. In the summer of 1933, a nice old gentleman
wearing a silk hat fell off the end of a pier.
He was unable to swim. A friend
ran down the pier, dived overboard and pulled him out; but the silk hat floated
off with the tide. After the old
gentleman had been revived, he was effusive in this thanks. He praised his friend for saving his
life. Today, three years later, the old
gentleman is berating his friend because the silk hat was lost.”
Then he talked about his opponents’ claims regarding
taxes, job creation, and Social Security:
“Let me warn you and let me warn the Nation against the smooth evasion
which says, ‘Of course we believe [in] all these things. We believe in Social Security; we believe in
work for the unemployed; we believe in saving homes. Cross our hearts and hope to die, we believe
in all these things. But we do not like
the way the present Administration is doing them. Just turn them over to us. We will do all of them. We will do more of them and we will do them
better. And, most important of all, the
doing of them will not cost anybody anything.’
But, my friends, these evaders are banking too heavily on
the shortness of our memories. No one
will forget that they had their golden opportunity – twelve long years of it
... make no mistake about this: the
Republican leadership today is not against the way we have done the job. The Republican leadership is against the
job’s being done.”
Then he talked about the dishonesty of mixed messaged
based upon what different audiences want to hear: “You cannot be an Old Guard Republican in the
East, and a New Deal Republican in the West.
You cannot promise to repeal taxes before one audience and promise to
spend more of the taxpayers’ money before another audience. You cannot promise tax relief for those who
can afford to pay, and, at the same time, promise more of the taxpayers’ money
for those who are in need. You simply
cannot make good on both promises at the same time.”
And lastly, he clarified what it means to be a true
“conservative”: “Who is there in America
who believes that we can run the risk of turning back our Government to the old
leadership which brought it to the brink of 1933? … The true conservative seeks
to protect the system of private property and free enterprise by correcting
such injustices and inequalities as arise from it. The most serious threat to our institutions
comes from those who refuse to face the need for change.”
In 1936, Franklin Roosevelt won the most lopsided number
of electoral votes to date, losing only Maine and Vermont. His speech sounds all too relevant to us
today, because we have been in this place before. In spite of charges of “anti-capitalism” 100
years ago against Theodore Roosevelt when he broke up the mega-rich corporate
monopolies; “welfare state” in the 1930s against Social Security; “socialized
medicine” in the 1960s against Medicare; we have managed to move steadily forward
on health, civil rights, equal employment opportunities, education, and growth
in the standard of living for average
families. Over time we have managed to
progress in spite of the negative social, political and religious rhetoric of
each decade. And once again, we will
somehow manage to struggle through this current campaign environment towards
the better place that calls to each of us.
No comments:
Post a Comment