Another election is once again upon us: the non-presidential
midterm election of 2022. Historically, lacking the “star power” of a
presidential contest, midterm elections do not draw the attention or
participation of many voters. Hopefully, that will not be the case with this
midterm. This election is probably the most consequential midterm of my
lifetime, a needed referendum on the current state and future direction of the
country.
In a typical election, men and women run for office by
identifying various programs and priorities they promise to deliver – even
though the many levers of government preclude any one representative from accomplishing
much on his/her own. They are also likely to demonize their opponent as the
devil incarnate, while they alone can save the country from total collapse.
Buzz words (“socialism”) and sounds bites (“save social security”) will
dominate the political rhetoric; true debate or meaningful, constructive dialog
will be banished.
Election 2022 has a different call to citizens than picking a
list of political actions and programs. While these are important, there is a more
pressing need to (re-)affirm who our country is, what it stands for, and what
it values. Because we, as a country, have lost our best sense of ourselves, and
who we are about. There are two overriding issues we, the voters, need to
address in this election: 1) reaffirming our Constitution and its foundation of
the rule of Law that guides us; and 2) protecting, in fact enhancing, the accessibility
to, and power of, our vote.
In 2022, we need to clarify whether we will return to a
respect for Truth, Honesty, and the Law as fundamental to retain our
Constitutional Republic. We accept that politicians will stretch the truth in
order to benefit themselves. But over the last six years, outright lying,
obfuscation, and endless delays in accountability have become the standard.
“The Big Lie(s)” of unsubstantiated “facts” and opinion has made the most
implausible seemingly plausible; political posturing has replaced Integrity
within many of our American institutions. The bedrock principle that “no man or
woman is above the Law” has been shuffled out the door in favor of rampant,
unchecked illegality. The stability of Judicial Precedent has been shattered. “For
the good of the individual” is replacing “For the good of the Country” as the
basis for public service. The equal ability to partake in the country’s
economic, religious, and personal opportunities has become questionable. The
baffling, increasing violence that surrounds us daily is testament to our
division and frustrations. The discord reflects our continual difficulty in
trying to balance our Individual Rights versus our Community Responsibility.
As a result of our discord, Trust in our governmental
institutions and public servants is at an all-time low; Trust in each other is too
often non-existent. This lack of trust makes finding solutions to our many
problems near-impossible. We argue incessantly; we do not listen to each other.
We do not converse; we yell at each other. Hardened partisan speeches promote
our separation and a one-sided view of our Constitutional principles. Yet the
strong-minded men who wrote that Constitution realized that they were dependent
upon the practical tool of Compromise. Their lesson to each of us is that
without Compromise, there would not have been a Constitution. Without that
Constitution, there would have been no United States of America.
The right to vote, through which the right to have a say in
our government actions and the individuals selected to deliver the will of the
people, is one of the primary gifts of American citizenship. For nearly 250 years
that right has been expanding to include increasing groups within our
electorate. Yet over the last four years we have seen one of the greatest
assaults on voting rights since Reconstruction. At times, the right to vote was
limited by law: e.g. restricting voting to property owners, or only to men. In
other times, it was restricted by actions: e.g. paying poll taxes, requiring literacy
tests, subjected to violence and intimidation. With the 1965 Voting Rights Act,
most of the overt legal limitations were ended; thereafter, we chipped away at
ending the action-based limitations. What we see today are limitations that are
“tactically” based. These are the tricks misused to benefit one political
party/candidate over another. We see polling stations set up in intentionally
inconvenient locations with inconvenient hours; reduced time frames and/or sites
for early voting; more technical requirements for obtaining an absentee ballot;
restrictions on providing food or drink to people in long lines waiting to vote;
dubious challenges to voter rolls. These and other tactics are specifically designed
to discourage targeted groups from being able to make their voting intention
count. They are all justified as “needed steps to prevent voter fraud” – would-be
solutions to a problem we do not have in any meaningful or consequential quantity.
Preserving our democratic foundation, and protecting – and
expanding – our right to vote. These are reasons that Election 2022 is so
important. We should not be unduly fighting over specific policies and
programs; these will continue to come and go as they always have. Rather, we
should put our focus – and vote – on the character and integrity of our
candidates. Who among them consistently tells us the hard truths; speaks and
acts in the positive; is capable of playing well with others; is informed and
knowledgeable about the issues facing us; is consistent in their opinions yet
able to adapt to new information. Versus those who spout knee-jerk reactions;
speaks in the negative; does not play well with others; accepts and/or promotes
lies.
These are the overriding issues that we face. Over the last
decade, the American Ship of State has taken quite a beating attempting to
navigate its way through many stormy waters. The story is told that shortly
after the last session of the Constitutional Convention concluded, Benjamin Franklin
was leaving the Pennsylvania State House when he encountered one Elizabeth
Powel. Ms. Powel asked Dr. Franklin,
“Well, Doctor, what have we got – a republic or a monarchy?” Franklin is said to have replied, “A
republic, if you can keep it.” Can we keep it, as Dr. Franklin challenges us to
do? We need to vote accordingly, as if our future as a country depends upon it.
Because it does.
© 2022
Randy Bell https://ThoughtsFromTheMountain.blogspot.com